Corneliu LEU - SECOLUL SI DEMOCRATIA
Mariana Cristescu, Damen Passo Doble, Editura Nico, Târgu Mures, 2012

Se cere anchetarea cazului Tanasescu vs. Zamfirescu

     
                         RAPORTUL M C V , O VEDERE DIN AVION?
 
   Se implinesc sase luni de cind informam conducerea Romaniei si a Uniunii Europene, Vaticanul si Ambasada SUA la Bucuresi, despre cererea adresata Procurorului General al Romaniei, Ministrului Justitiei si Ministrului Afacerilor Interne, de a se ancheta cazul Tanasescu vs. Zamfirescu, care treneaza de peste 16 ani. Ca nu am primit nici un cuvint din care sa constat ca am fost auzit, este de inteles, reclamam  seful, unor subalterni. Dar ca sa-l auzi pe primul ministru spunind ca guvernul lui nu a fost criticat in Raportul MCV, este o palma pe obrazul intocmitorilor raportului.
   Dupa 16 ani, in care am fost victima unei bande de crima organizata si trafic de influenta, in care am fost bataia de joc a delicventilor, calomniat, insultat si amenintat cu moartea, dupa 16 ani, la capatul carora am aflat ca criminalul care a coordonat, sustinut si protejat banda de hoti este chiar primul ministru al Romaniei, Victor Viorel Ponta, nu pot sa nu strig omenirii ca Uniunea Europeana, prin raportul MCV, da unda verde de actiune, coloanei bolsevice care, la ordinul lui Gorbaciov, a cotropit Romania. Nu pot accepta si voi sustine pina la conducerea NATO si a Statelor Unite, pericolul pe care Ponta si mentorul sau, Ion Iliescu, il reprezinta pentru NATO, Uniunea Europeana si Statele Unite, in conditiile in care, IN PREZENT SE PUN BAZELE UNUI IMPERIU EUROASIATIC, DIN CARE SA FACA PARTE SI ROMANIA.
   Am prezentat justitiei si conducerii Romaniei, acte criminale savirsite de Ponta, cit sa fie condamnat pe viata, nu am primit nici un cuvint din care sa inteleg ca am fost bagat in seama. Acesta este statul de drept clamat de toti conducatorii? E de prisos sa mai arat cum influenta lui Ponta m'a facut sa cunosc cea mai de jos treapta a societatii americane, material si moral. Traiesc cu speranta ca si zilele bune ale lui Ponta si clica lui de netrebnici, se vor sfirsi. Chiar daca, dupa mine.
   Urez succes, in continuare, justitiei romane.   Gheorghe Tanasescu / 01 februarie 2015.
 
   The investigation of Tanasescu vs. Zamfirescu is requested


Honoured:        GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF ROMANIA, MINISTER OF JUSTICE, MINISTER OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS.
 
As a result of my letter as f July 28, 2014, addressed to the lawyer Lucian Mihai and brought into notice to some public bodies of Romania and European Union, by which I was formulating accusations addressed to the Public Ministry and to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, I hereby ask the General Prosecutor, the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Internal Affairs to order the public investigation of the case  Tanasescu vs. Zamfirescu, dated over 16 years ago and the application of some appropriate measures of the state governed by the rule of law. My request is based on the belief that I am the victim of the plot of a band of organized crime and influence peddling, orchestrated by individuals from the high society. For years, I am obsessed of the idea that Zamfirescu and his band’s actions and deeds, indictable at first glance, passed unnoticed by prosecutors, press and I am afraid that they were not highlighted even by the police bodies. Moreover, I was vexed by the letter no. 2440/J/2001, as of August 21, 2001,  of Mrs. Director Mariana Rudareanu, as a response to my complaints addressed to the Ministry of Justice, in which she says: “With a view to settle the complaint regarding the delay of researches in the case of criminal complaints regarding the two lawyers and the expert assigned in the civil cause, for the performance of an accounting expertise, the memoir was sent to the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Supreme Court of Justice – Criminal Investigation and Criminology Section”. And the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Supreme Court of Justice – Criminal Investigation and Criminology Section, answers in the letter registered under the no. 15435/2983/2001: “Your memoir addressed to the Ministry of Justice was sent at the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Bucharest Court of Appeals for verification and settlement. You shall receive the result of the verification from the above mention unit”. And I am still waiting the result of the verification.  It is worth noting that, even that I have never made a criminal complaint, Mrs. Director Mariana Rudareanu calls the complaint “criminal complaints”. Why? Because the answer of Mrs. Rudareanu was happening exactly after one year since the bank robbery and the crime against my brother, Tanasescu Mircea, my prosecutor. The illuminating question, to which all the investigators should answer: “Is it possible that, in broad daylight, in the centre of Bucharest, an old man (76 years old), be seized from the street, sequestrated, beaten, brought by car home to take his deposit books, be brought to BRD- Carol Branch Office, to draw from the paymaster Mariana Popescu 44,815,000 lei and be left to die in torments, two months later, and THE PROSECUTOR FROM THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE ATTACHED TO THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE – ANTICORRUPTION, CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND CRIMINOLOGY SECTION HAS NOT HEARD OF THIS TERRIBLE EVENT?  What about the Secretary of State, the Head of the Government Control Body? WHAT ABOUT THE MEMBER OF THE SPECIAL COMMISSION REGARDING THE CRIMINAL DEEDS COMMITTED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNMENT?
   What about the Police, the General Directorate of Police of Bucharest Municipality, Mister Police Chief Commissary, Ionescu Daniel, to whom I reported, ON MAY 7, 2013, the dreadful hold-up against an old man and his spoliation, made researches to find the attackers and to defer them to the justice? He made public this sad event; he gave to the press the data to help the Investigation? Or is it that he contented with the record and application of the Omerta? But from the letter of my brother, discovered by me this year and transmitted, confidentially, to Mister Commissary Ionescu Daniel, has anything reached to justice, such as Zamfirescu’s involvement, without any right, in the process of recovery of the jewelry seized and existing at Otopeni customs?  Has the police noticed the fact that Mircea Tanasescu was seized from Piata Unirii, just as he was going to Otopeni customs? Has it researched the declaration from the letter, according to which Zamfirescu told my brother he performed the levy of execution and the authentication of the decision for the retrocession of jewelry that cost him 40,000 lei?. A fact that must be known by the court is that regarding the deposits at BRD, in the sense that the money was deposited with an interest rate of 51%, for three months.
   In the letter entitled “Justice and Police”, addressed to the General Directorate of Police of Bucharest Municipality, as of October 6, 2012, I was writing: “I have received your letter no. 44508 as of October 9, 2012, which astonished me, reading that the aspects mentioned in my petition are not under the competence of the General Directorate of Police of Bucharest Municipality. Dear fellow citizens, if the “Police”, the only structure that, as a result of the investigation carried out, knows the entire truth, the only one able to confirm or infirm all my complaints along the last 14 years, since I am considered a reject of the society, can assert that the issues mentioned are not under the competence of this institution, this means that, in the lack of the single source of truth, I have nothing to do than public ban and expatriation.
   On August 29, 2012, I was writing to the Ministry of Administration and Interior, to the Bucharest Police and to the District 2 Bucharest Police that, following the counterstatement submitted by the defendant Zamfirescu Adrian Doru, I had the occasion to see the power of attorney I had signed, blindly, on May 11, 1998 and I was asking the Ministry of Administration and Interior “to give me the possibility to know the result of the investigation made in this case and to start a criminal trial to the extent of the seriousness of the deeds. I was mentioning in the letter that during those 14 years, various forgeries, deceits, threats, influence peddling, concealment, collaboration with the criminal, etc. were put into practice by the Prosecutor’s Office of District 2, Bucharest, the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Bucharest Court of Appeal, the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice and the Superior Council of Magistracy, illegalities that I brought to the attention of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MAI), with which occasion I disclosed to it the attempt of the prosecutors, up to the highest level, to involve the police bodies in the frauds committed by them. The police report on the tenebrous maneuvers and forgeries committed by the units of the Public Ministry was permanently prohibited to me, even when I was forced to play the role of plaintiff in the staging of criminal trial against the prosecutor Pantilie Nicoleta, of whom I have never heard than with the occasion of the so-called criminal trial, which I hope to come back to the attention of the superior bodies of justice.
   On September 26 , 2012 I was addressing to the Superior Council of Magistracy – Judicial Inspection, reporting it the fraudulent way in which the judge Ifrim S., other than the president of the panel, Octavia Marcela Alecsiu, ordered the transfer of the case file no. 27308/299/2011 from District 1 Bucharest Court to Buftea County Court (the fief of the organized crime band, the result of the investigations being permanently prohibited to me).
   On June 23, 2014, I was writing to my lawyer, Lucian Mihai, and I was reporting to the leaders and press of Romania, as well as to the embassies of the European Union countries, THE REASONS OF CRIMINAL ACTION TO THE CIVIL SENTENCE NO. 1322 AS OF 10.04.2014 OF BUFTEA COUNTY COURT (the fief of the organized crime band - Zamfirescu, lawyer of Ilfov Bar, Pantilie Nicoleta, prosecutor at Buftea County Court and to their acolytes).  It is what I was calling suicidal terrorist attack to the court. Along six pages, one can see how a judge, in a criminal sentence, performed upon the order of his/her superiors, dissolves the cry for help in finding the truth of some elders, from whom one had stolen, being lied, manipulated, humiliated, beaten and killed. For more than 16 years. It’s a shame!
 
 
    THE FORCED TRANSFER OF THE CASE FILE NO. 27308/299/2011 FROM DISTRICT 1 COURT (WHERE IT WAS ON FINAL JUDGMENT PHASE) TO BUFTEA COUNTY COURT, THE CRIMINAL SENTENCE NO. 1322/ 10.04.2014 OF BUFTEA COUNTY COURT, THE HOLD-UP (AGAINST TANASESCU MIRCEA, THE ATTORNEY-AT-FACT OF THE PLAINTIFF) CONSISTING OF A BANK ROBBERY AND A MURDER), THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE – CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND CRIMINOLOGY SECTION’S FAILURE TO OBSERVE THE CRIMINAL JUDGMENT OF THE CRIMINALS FROM THE CASE FILE TANASESCU VS. ZAMFIRESCU, THE FACILITATION OF THE DEFENDANT ZAMFIRESCU ADRIAN DORU IN ALL THE CONFRONTATIONS WITH THE POLICE AND JUSTICE ETC. ETC., LEAD TO THE CONCLUSION THAT ALL THESE WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED WITHOUT THE PROTECTION AND EVEN ENCOURAGEMENT OF VICTOR PONTA.
This conclusion (because I engaged to tell the entire truth) was confirmed by “The second open letter to Victor Ponta”, written by Satu Mare Senator, Valer Marian /1.07.2013. In this letter, which is drawn up under the form of some questions, even at point 1, he asked: “Is it true that when you were very young, namely in the 90’s, you had a sadistic behavior towards your father (also mentioned by your mother in a letter published in press), who was bedridden because of a tormenting cancer? Is it true that during the summer of 1990, when you were 18 years old, you bestially beat your father, breaking him a leg, fact that aggravated his health condition and accelerated his death?”(. . . . ). pct.5 “Is it true that, while you were prosecutor at the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice, you settled a single indictments file and that a release solution was pronounced within it?” ( . . . . ). pct.8 “ Is it true that, while you were the head of the Control Body of the prime-minister Adrian Nastase, you repeatedly tried to determine the prosecutor Cristian Panait, who was your colleague and friend, to arrest the prosecutor Alexandru Lele from Bihor County Prosecutor’s Office, being guilty of having arrested, for petrol product smuggling, the son of Bihor County Prosecutor’s Office, Adrian Tarau, known as local sponsor of PSD ?”. Is it true that you have contributed to the suicide of the prosecutor Panait? How can you explain that his aunt, at whom he was living, stated that his last words, before throwing himself to void from the building, where “That dog, Ponta, did it to me”?   Even if interesting, the entire “Second open letter to Victor Ponta”, I have reproduced only the points that directed me to the conclusion that Victor Ponta orchestrated the criminal deeds that destroyed 16 years of my life.
To the same conclusion the description of Victor Ponta in Wikipedia – Free encyclopedia also competed, from which I reproduce: “From 1998 to 2001, he was a prosecutor at the Supreme Court of Justice in the anti-corruption division, in particular dealing with economic and financial crimes. On April 10, 2002, Cristian Panait, a fellow prosecutor in the anti-corruption division who was working on some high-profile corruption cases involving then-Prime-Minister Adrian Nastase, died in a free fall from the terrace of his Bucharest home under unclear circumstances. Ponta was the main suspect, based on the testimony of his aunt, who claimed that she was told by Panait that he was supposed to meet Ponta that evening and before dying, Panait said "that Ponta dog did it". The prosecutor who handled the Panait case was forced to retire by Minister of Justice Rodica Stanoiu and the prosecutor who took over decided it was a suicide. Ponta being cleared of all charges. Democrat -Liberal leader Adriean Videanu accused Ponta of being the "moral culprit" in Panait's death, also accusing him of blackmailing Panait, which eventually lead to his suicide.”
The accusations from Wikipedia are many, but I have reproduced only the criminal part, in which I see again the death of my brother and the attack against me.
   I AM ASKING THE ROMANIAN POLICE WHAT DID IT DO, FOR MORE THAN ONE YEAR, FOR THE DISCOVERY OF CRIMINALS WHO COMMITTED THE HOLD-UP AGAINST MY BROTHER AND TO BRING THEM IN FRONT OF JUSTICE? WHAT ABOUT THE PRESS ? WHAT ABOUT THE CIVIL SOCIETY? REASONS FOR WHICH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND OF THE UNITES STATES MUST BE REQUESTED. IF THE POLICE ACCOMPLISHED ITS DUTY IN THE CASE OF MY BROTHER, TANASESCU MIRCEA, THE PROSECUTOR PANAIT WOULD HAVE LIVED EVEN TODAY.
   Waiting an official answer, thank you for your attention.
  GHEORGHE TANASESCU / AUGUST 02, 2014.






    Subject: Se cere anchetarea cazului Tanasescu vs. Zamfirescu

    onor :        PROCURORUL GENERAL AL ROMANIEI,  MINISTRUL JUSTITIEI,  MINISTRUL AFACERILOR INTERNE.
     
    Urmare scrisorii mele din 28 iulie 2014, adresata avocatului Lucian Mihai si adusa la cunostinta unor organisme de stat din Romania si Uniunea Europeana, prin care formulam acuzatii la adresa Ministerului Public si Ministerului de Interne, rog, prin prezenta, Procurorul General, Ministrul Justitiei si Ministrul Afacerilor Interne, sa dispuna  anchetarea publica a cazului Tanasescu vs. Zamfirescu care dateaza de peste 16 ani si aplicarea unor masuri  corespunzatoare  statului de drept. Solicitarea mea se bazeaza pe credinta ca sunt victima complotului unei bande de crima organizata si traffic de influenta, orchestrata de indivizi din inalta societate. De ani de zile sunt obsedat de idea ca acte si fapte ale lui Zamfirescu si banda lui, condamnabile de la prima vedere, au trecut neobservate de procurori, de presa si, ma tem ca neevidentiate, chiar si de organelle de politie. De asemenea, m'a contrariat scrisoarea nr. 2440/J/2001, din 21 augut 2001,  a doamnei director Mariana Rudareanu, ca raspuns la plingerile mele adresata Ministerului Justitiei, in care spune: "In vederea solutionarii plingerii cu privire la tergiversarea cercetarilor in cazul sesizarilor penale cu privire la cei doi avocati si expertul desemnat in cauza civila, pentru efectuarea unei expertize contabile, memoriul a fost trimis la Parchetul de pe linga Curtea Suprema de Justitie - Sectia de urmarire penala si criminalistica". Iar Parchetul de pe linga Curtea Suprema de Justitie - Sectia de urmarire penala si criminalistica, cu nr 15435/2983/2001, raspunde: "Memoriul dv. adresat Ministerului Justitiei s-a trimis la Parchetul de pe linga Curte de Apel Bucuresti pentru verificare si solutionare. Rezultatul verificarii il veti primi de la unitatea susmentionata". Rezultat al verificarii pe care il astept si astazi.  Important de subliniat este faptul ca, desi eu niciodata nu am facut plingere penala, Doamna director Mariana Rudareanu numeste plingerea "sesizari penale". De ce?. Pentru ca raspunsul doamnei Rudareanu se petrecea la exact un an de la jaful bancar si crima asupra fratelui meu, Tanasescu Mircea, procuratorul meu. Intrebarea edificatoare, la care anchetatorii trebuie sa raspunda: "Este posibil ca, in plina zi, in centrul Bucurestiului, un batrin (76 de ani), sa fie ridicat de pe strada, sechestrat, batut, dus cu masina acasa ca sa-si ia carnetele de depunere, dus la BRD-Filiala Carol, scos de la casiera Mariana Popescu 44.815.000 lei si lasat sa moara in chinuri, doua luni mai tirziu, si PROCURORUL PARCHETULUI DE PE LINGA CURTEA SUPREMA DE JUSTITIE - SECTIA DE ANTICORUPTIE, URMARIRE PENALA SI CRIMINALISTICA, SA NU FI AUZIT DE ACEST GROAZNIC EVENIMENT?   Dar Secretarul de stat, seful Corpului de control al Guvernului ?. DAR MEMBRU AL COMISIEI SPECIALE PRIVIND FAPTELE DE NATURA PENALA COMISE DE MEMBRI GUVERNULUI ?
       Dar Politia, Directia Generala de Politie a Municipiului Bucuresti, Domnul Comisar Sef de politie, Ionescu Daniel, caruia I-am relatat, LA 7 MAI 2013 monstruosul atac banditesc asupra unui batrin si jefuirea lui, a cercetat ca sa afle atacatorii si sa-i defere justitiei?. A facut public acest trist eveniment, a dat presei datele pentru a ajuta Ancheta? Sau s'a multumit cu inregistrarea si aplicarea omertei. Dar din scrisoarea fratelui meu, descoperita de mine in acest an si transmisa, confidential, dlui comisar Ionescu Daniel, a ajuns ceva la justitie, precum implicarea, fara nici un drept, a lui Zamfirescu in procesul de recuperare a bijuteriilor confiscate si existente la Vama Otopeni?.  A sesizat politia aspectul ca Mircea Tanasescu a fost ridicat din Piata Unirii, tocmai cind mergea la Vama Otopeni ?. A cercetat relatarea din scrisoare potrivit careia Zamfirescu i-a spus fratelui meu ca a facut executarea silita si legalizarea hotaririi de retrocedare a bijuteriilor care l-au costat 40.000 lei?. Un fapt ce trebuie stiut de instanta este acela privind depunerile la BRD, in sensul ca banii au fost depusi cu o dobinda de 51%, la trei luni.
       In scrisoarea intitulata "Justitia si Politia", adresata Directiei Generale de Politie a Municipiului Bucuresti, la 6 oct.2012, scrieam : "Am primit scrioarea dumneavoastra nr.44508 din 9.10.2012, care m'a uimit, citind ca, aspectele mentionate in petitia mea, nu sunt de competenta Directiei Generale de Politie a municipiului Bucuresti. Stimati concetateni, daca "Politia", singura structura care, ca urmare anchetei facute, cunoaste tot adevarul, singura in masura sa confirme sau sa infirme toate plingerile mele din ultimii 14 ani, de cind sunt considerat un rebut al societatii, poate afirma ca aspectele mentionate nu sunt de competenta acestei institutii, inseamna ca, in lipsa singurei surse de adevar, nu-mi ramine decit oprobriul public si expatrierea.
       La 29 august 2012, scrieam Ministerului Administratiei si Internelor, Politiei Capitalei si Politiei Sectorului 2 Bucuresti ca, in urma Intimpinarii depusa de inculpatul Zamfirescu Adrian Doru, am avut ocazia sa vad procura pe care am semnat-o, in orb, la 11 mai 1998 si rugam Ministerul Administratiei si Internelor "sa-mi acorde posibilitatea de a cunoaste rezultatul anchetei intreprinsa in acest caz si sa dea curs unui process penal pe masura gravitatii faptelor. Mentionam in scrisoare ca pe parcursul celor 14 ani s'au savirsit numeroase falsuri,, induceri in eroare, amenintari, traffic de influenta, tainuire, colaborare cu infractorul etc. puse in practica de Parchetul sectorului 2 Bucuresti, Parchetul Curtii de Apel Bucuresti, Parchetul Inaltei Curti de Casatie si Justitie si Consiliul Superior al Magistraturii, ilegalitati pe care le-am adus la cuostinta MAI, ocazie cu care, am dezvaluit acestuia, incercarea procurorilor, pina la cel mai inalt nivel, de a implica in fraudele savirsite de ei, organelle de politie. Raportul politiei asupra tenebroaselor manevre si falsuri savirsite de unitatile Ministerului Public, mi-a fost permanent interzis, chiar si atunci cind am fost obligat sa joc rolul de petent in inscenarea de process penal impotriva procurorului Pantilie Nicoleta, de care nu am auzit decit cu ocazia acelui, asa zis, process penal, care, sper sa revina in atentia organelor superioare de justitie.
       La 26 sept.2012 ma adresam Consiliului Superior al Magistraturii - Inspectia Judiciara, relatindu-i modul fraudulos in care  judecatoarea Ifrim S., alta decit presedintele completului de judecata, Octavia Marcela Alecsiu, a dispus mutarea dosarului nr. 27308/299/2011 de la Judecatoria Sectorului 1 Bucuresti, la Judecatoria Buftea (fieful bandei de crima organizata,. Rezultatul anchetelor fiindu-mi interzise, permanent).
       La 23 iunie 2014 scrieam avocatului meu, Lucian Mihai si aduceam la cunostinta conducerii si presei din Romania, precum si ambasadelor tarilor din Uniunea Europeana, MOTIVELE DE ACTIUNE PENALA LA SENTINTA CIVILA NR.1322 DIN 10.04.2014 A JUDECATORIEI BUFTEA (fieful bandei de crima organizata - Zamfirescu, avocet al Baroului Ilfov , Pantilie Nicoleta, procurer la Judecatoria Buftea si acolitii lor).  Este ceea ce eu numeam atac terrorist sinucigas la instanta. Pe parcursul a sase pagini se poate vedea cum un judecator, intr'o sentinta criminala, efectuata la comanda superiorilor, desfiinteaza strigatul de ajutor pentru aflarea adevarului a unor batrini, furati, mintiti, manipulati, umiliti, batuti si omoriti. timp de peste 16 ani. Rusine!.
     
     
        MUTAREA FORTATA A  DOSARULUI NR. 27308/299/2011 DE LA JUDECATORIA SECTORULUI 1 (UNDE ERA IN FAZA FINALA DE JUDECATA) LA JUDECATORIA BUFTEA, SENTINTA CRIMINALA NR. 1322/ 10.04.2014 A JUDECATORIEI BUFTRA, ATACUL BANDITESC ( ASUPRA LUI TANASESCU MIRCEA, MANDATARUL RECLAMANTULUI) CONSTIND INTR'UN JAF BANCAR SI UN ASASINAT), NERESPECTAREA DE CATRE CURTEA SUPREMA DE JUSTITIE-SECTIA DE URMARIRE PENALA SI CRIMINALISTICA A JUDECATII PENALE A INFRACTORILOR DIN DOSARUL TANASESCU VS. ZAMFIRESCU, FAVORIZAREA INCULPATULUI ZAMFIRESCU ADRIAN DORU IN TOATE CONFRUNTARILE CU POLITIA SI JUSTITIA ETC. ETC., CONDUC LA CONCLUZIA CA TOATE ACESTEA NU S'AR FI PETRECUT FARA PROTECTIA SI CHIAR INCURAJAREA LUI VICTOR PONTA.
    Aceasta concluzie (pentru ca tot m'am angajat sa spun tot adevarul) a fost intarita de "A doua scrisoare deschisa catre Victor Ponta", de senatorul de Satu Mare, Valer Marian /1.07.2013. In aceasta scrisoare, care este redactata sub forma de intrebari, chiar la pct.1, intreaba: "Daca in frageda tinerete, respectiv, in anii '90, ati avut un comportament sadic fata de tatal dumneavoastra mentionat si de mama dumneavoastra intr'o scrisoare publicata in presa), care era imobilizat la pat din cauza unui cancer chinuitor? Daca, in vara anului 1990, cind aveati 18 ani, l-ati batut bestial pe tatal dumneavoastra, rupandu-i un picior, fapt care I-a agravat starea de sanatate si I-a grabit decesul?".(. . . . ). pct.5 "Daca este adevarat ca, in timp ce erati procurer la Parchetul de pe langa Inalta Curte de Casatie si Justitie, ati solutionat un singur dosar cu rechizitoriu si ca in acesta s'a pronuntat solutie de achitare?". ( . . . . ). pct.8 "Daca, in timp ce erati sef al Corpului de control al primului ministru Adrian Nastase, ati incercat de mai multe ori sa-l determinati pe procurorul Cristian Panait, care v-a fost coleg si prieten, sa-l aresteze pe procurorul Alexandru Lele de la Parchetul Judetean Bihor, "vinovat" pentru ca l-a arestat, pentru contrabanda cu produse petroliere, pe fiul prefectului judetului Bihor, Adrian Tarau, cunoscut sponsor local al PSD?".Daca ati contribuit la sinuciderea procurorului Panait?. Cum va explicate ca matusa la care acesta locuia a afirmat ca ultimele sale cuvinte, inainte de a se arunca in gol de pe cladire, au fost "Cainele Ponta m-a ucis"?. Desi interesanta, intreaga "A doua scrisoare deschisa catre Victor Ponta", am redat numai punctele care m-au calauzit catre concluzia ca Victor Ponta a orchestrat actele criminale care mi-au distrus 16 ani de viata.
    La aceeasi concluzie a concurat si descrierea lui Victor Ponta in Wikipedia - Enciclopedia libera, din care redau: "In perioada 1998-2001, acesta a fost procuror al Curtii Supreme de Justitie in cadrul diviziei anticoruptie, ocupandu-se in special de delictele economice si financiare. In data de 10 aprilie 2002, Cristian Panait, un coleg procuror din cadrul Diviziei Anticoruptie cu care acesta lucra la cateva cazuri de coruptie la nivel inalt implicand in acea vreme pe Prim-Ministrul Adrian Nastase, a decedat in urma caderii libere de la terasa domiciliului sau din Bucuresti in circumstante neclare. Ponta a fost principalul suspect, pe baza marturiei matusii sale, care a pretins ca Panait ii spusese ca trebuia sa se intilneasca cu Ponta in acea seara si, inainte sa moara, Panait a spus "Cainele de Ponta mi-a facut-o". Procurorul care s'a ocupat de cazul Panait a fost fortat sa se retraga de catre Ministrul Justitiei, Rodica Stanoiu, iar procurorul care a preluat cazul a decis ca a fost o sinucidere. Toate acuzatiile impotriva lui Ponta au fost retrase.  Liderul Democrat-Liberal, Adriean Videanu, l-a acuzat pe Ponta ca fiind "faptasul moral" al mortii lui Panait, acuzindu-l pe acesta si de santaj impotriva lui Panait, ceea ce a dus in cele din urma la gestul sinucigas al acestuia".Multe sunt acuzatiile din Vikipedia, dar eu am redat numai partea criminalistica, in care revad moartea fratelui meu si atentatul asupra mea.
       INREB POLITIA ROMANA, CE A FACUT, TIMP DE PESTE UN AN, IN DESCOPERIREA CRIMINALILOR CARE AU SAVIRSIT ATACUL BANDITESC ASUPRA FRATELUI MEU SI ADUCEREA LOR IN FATA JUSTITIEI ?. DAR PRESA?. DAR SOCIETATEA CIVILA?. MOTIVE PENTRU CARE TREBUIE CERUTA ASISTENTA UNIUNII EUROPENE SI A STATELOR UNITE, CONSIDERIND CA DACA POLITIA ISI FACEA DATORIA IN CAZUL FRATELUI MEU, TANASESCU MIRCEA, PROCURORUL PANAIT AR FI TRAIT SI ASTAZI.
       In asteptarea unui raspuns official, va multumesc pentru atentie.  GHEORGHE TANASESCU / 02 AUGUST 2014.
      
       



 
Honoured:  GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF ROMANIA, MINISTER OF JUSTICE, MINISTER OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS. As a result of my letter as f July 28, 2014, addressed to the lawyer  Lucian Mihai and brought into notice to some public bodies of Romania and European Union, by which I was formulating accusations addressed to the Public Ministry and to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, I hereby ask the General Prosecutor,  the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Internal Affairs to order the public investigation of the case  Tanasescu vs. Zamfirescu, dated over 16 years ago and the application of some appropriate measures of the state governed by the rule of law. My request is based on the belief that I am the victim of the plot of a band of organized crime and influence peddling, orchestrated by individuals from the high society. For years, I am obsessed of the idea that Zamfirescu and his band’s actions and deeds, indictable at first glance, passed unnoticed by prosecutors, press and I am afraid that they were not highlighted even by the police bodies. Moreover, I was vexed by the letter no. 2440/J/2001, as of August 21, 2001,  of Mrs. Director Mariana Rudareanu, as a response to my complaints addressed to the Ministry of Justice, in which she says: “With a view to settle the complaint regarding the delay of researches in the case of criminal complaints regarding the two lawyers and the expert assigned in the civil cause, for the performance of an accounting expertise, the memoir was sent to the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Supreme Court of Justice – Criminal Investigation and Criminology Section”. And the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Supreme Court of Justice – Criminal Investigation and Criminology Section, answers in the letter registered under the no. 15435/2983/2001: “Your memoir addressed to the Ministry of Justice was sent at the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Bucharest Court of Appeals for verification and settlement. You shall receive the result of the verification from the above mention unit”. And I am still waiting the result of the verification.  It is worth noting that, even that I have never made a criminal complaint, Mrs. Director Mariana Rudareanu calls the complaint “criminal complaints”. Why? Because the answer of Mrs. Rudareanu was happening exactly after one year since the bank robbery and the crime against my brother, Tanasescu Mircea, my prosecutor. The illuminating question, to which all the investigators should answer: “Is it possible that, in broad daylight, in the centre of Bucharest, an old man (76 years old), be seized from the street, sequestrated, beaten, brought by car home to take his deposit books, be brought to BRD- Carol Branch Office, to draw from the paymaster Mariana Popescu 44,815,000 lei and be left to die in torments, two months later, and THE PROSECUTOR FROM THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE ATTACHED TO THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE – ANTICORRUPTION, CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND CRIMINOLOGY SECTION HAS NOT HEARD OF THIS TERRIBLE EVENT?  What about the Secretary of State, the Head of the Government Control Body? WHAT ABOUT THE MEMBER OF THE SPECIAL COMMISSION REGARDING THE CRIMINAL DEEDS COMMITTED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNMENT?    What about the Police, the General Directorate of Police of Bucharest Municipality, Mister Police Chief Commissary, Ionescu Daniel, to whom I reported, ON MAY 7, 2013, the dreadful hold-up against an old man and his spoliation, made researches to find the attackers and to defer them to the justice? He made public this sad event; he gave to the press the data to help the Investigation? Or is it that he contented with the record and application of the Omerta? But from the letter of my brother, discovered by me this year and transmitted, confidentially, to Mister Commissary  Ionescu Daniel, has anything reached to justice, such as Zamfirescu’s involvement, without any right, in the process of recovery of the jewelry seized and existing at Otopeni customs?  Has the police noticed the fact that Mircea Tanasescu was seized from Piata Unirii, just as he was going to Otopeni customs? Has it researched the declaration from the letter, according to which Zamfirescu told my brother he performed the levy of execution and the authentication of the decision for the retrocession of jewelry that cost him  40,000 lei?. A fact that must be known by the court is that regarding the deposits at BRD, in the sense that the money was deposited with an interest rate of 51%, for three months.    In the letter entitled “Justice and Police”, addressed to the General Directorate of Police of Bucharest Municipality, as of October 6, 2012, I was writing: “I have received your letter no. 44508 as of October 9, 2012, which astonished me, reading that the aspects mentioned in my petition are not under the competence of the General Directorate of Police of Bucharest Municipality. Dear fellow citizens, if the “Police”, the only structure that, as a result of the investigation carried out, knows the entire truth, the only one able to confirm or infirm all my complaints along the last 14 years, since I am considered a reject of the society, can assert that the issues mentioned are not under the competence of this institution, this means that, in the lack of the single source of truth, I have nothing to do than public ban and expatriation.    On August 29, 2012, I was writing to the Ministry of Administration and Interior, to the Bucharest Police and to the District 2 Bucharest Police that, following the counterstatement submitted by the defendant Zamfirescu Adrian Doru, I had the occasion to see the power of attorney I had signed, blindly, on May 11, 1998 and I was asking the Ministry of Administration and Interior “to give me the possibility to know the result of the investigation made in this case and to start a criminal trial to the extent of the seriousness of the deeds. I was mentioning in the letter that during those 14 years, various forgeries, deceits, threats, influence peddling, concealment, collaboration with the criminal, etc. were put into practice by the Prosecutor’s Office of District 2, Bucharest, the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Bucharest Court of Appeal, the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice and the Superior Council of Magistracy, illegalities that I brought to the attention of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MAI), with which occasion I disclosed to it the attempt of the prosecutors, up to the highest level, to involve the police bodies in the frauds committed by them. The police report on the tenebrous maneuvers and forgeries committed by the units of the Public Ministry was permanently prohibited to me, even when I was forced to play the role of plaintiff in the staging of criminal trial against the prosecutor Pantilie Nicoleta, of whom I have never heard than with the occasion of the so-called criminal trial, which I hope to come back to the attention of the superior bodies of justice.   On September  26 , 2012 I was addressing to the Superior Council of Magistracy – Judicial Inspection, reporting it the fraudulent way in which the judge Ifrim S., other than the president of the panel, Octavia Marcela Alecsiu, ordered the transfer of the case file no. 27308/299/2011 from District 1 Bucharest Court to Buftea County Court (the fief of the organized crime band, the result of the investigations being permanently prohibited to me).   On June 23, 2014, I was writing to my lawyer, Lucian Mihai, and I was reporting to the leaders and press of Romania, as well as to the embassies of the European Union countries, THE REASONS OF CRIMINAL ACTION TO THE CIVIL SENTENCE NO. 1322 AS OF 10.04.2014 OF BUFTEA COUNTY COURT (the fief of the organized crime band - Zamfirescu, lawyer of Ilfov Bar,  Pantilie Nicoleta, prosecutor at Buftea County Court and to their acolytes).  It is what I was calling suicidal terrorist attack to the court. Along six pages, one can see how a judge, in a criminal sentence, performed upon the order of his/her superiors, dissolves the cry for help in finding the truth of some elders, from whom one had stolen, being lied, manipulated, humiliated, beaten and killed. For more than 16 years. It’s a shame!  
    THE FORCED TRANSFER OF THE CASE FILE NO. 27308/299/2011 FROM DISTRICT 1 COURT (WHERE IT WAS ON FINAL JUDGMENT PHASE) TO BUFTEA COUNTY COURT, THE CRIMINAL SENTENCE NO. 1322/ 10.04.2014 OF BUFTEA COUNTY COURT, THE HOLD-UP (AGAINST TANASESCU MIRCEA, THE ATTORNEY-AT-FACT OF THE PLAINTIFF) CONSISTING OF A BANK ROBBERY AND A MURDER), THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE – CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND CRIMINOLOGY SECTION’S FAILURE TO OBSERVE THE CRIMINAL JUDGMENT OF THE CRIMINALS FROM THE CASE FILE TANASESCU VS. ZAMFIRESCU, THE FACILITATION OF THE DEFENDANT ZAMFIRESCU ADRIAN DORU IN ALL THE CONFRONTATIONS WITH THE POLICE AND JUSTICE ETC. ETC., LEAD TO THE CONCLUSION THAT ALL THESE WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED WITHOUT THE PROTECTION AND EVEN ENCOURAGEMENT OF VICTOR PONTA.This conclusion (because I engaged to tell the entire truth) was confirmed by “The second open letter to Victor Ponta”, written by Satu Mare Senator, Valer Marian /1.07.2013. In this letter, which is drawn up under the form of some questions, even at point 1, he asked: “Is it true that when you were very young, namely in the 90’s, you had a sadistic behavior towards your father (also mentioned by your mother in a letter published in press), who was bedridden because of a tormenting cancer? Is it true that during the summer of 1990, when you were 18 years old, you bestially beat your father, breaking him a leg, fact that aggravated his health condition and accelerated his death?”(. . . . ). pct.5 “Is it true that, while you were prosecutor at the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice, you settled a single indictments file and that a release solution was pronounced within it?” ( . . . . ). pct.8 “Is it true that, while you were the head of the Control Body of the prime-minister Adrian Nastase, you repeatedly tried to determine the prosecutor Cristian Panait, who was your colleague and friend, to arrest the prosecutor Alexandru Lele from Bihor County Prosecutor’s Office, being guilty of having arrested, for petrol product smuggling, the son of Bihor County Prosecutor’s Office, Adrian Tarau, known as local sponsor of PSD?”. Is it true that you have contributed to the suicide of the prosecutor Panait? How can you explain that his aunt, at whom he was living, stated that his last words, before throwing himself to void from the building, where “That dog, Ponta, did it to me”? Even if interesting, the entire “Second open letter to Victor Ponta”, I have reproduced only the points that directed me to the conclusion that Victor Ponta orchestrated the criminal deeds that destroyed 16 years of my life. To the same conclusion the description of Victor Ponta in Wikipedia – Free encyclopedia also competed, from which I reproduce: “From 1998 to 2001, he was a prosecutor at the Supreme Court of Justice in the anti-corruption division, in particular dealing with economic and financial crimes. On April 10, 2002, Cristian Panait, a fellow prosecutor in the anti-corruption division who was working on some high-profile corruption cases involving then-Prime-Minister Adrian Nastase, died in a free fall from the terrace of his Bucharest home under unclear circumstances. Ponta was the main suspect, based on the testimony of his aunt, who claimed that she was told by Panait that he was supposed to meet Ponta that evening and before dying, Panait said "that Ponta dog did it". The prosecutor who handled the Panait case was forced to retire by Minister of Justice Rodica Stanoiu and the prosecutor who took over decided it was a suicide. Ponta being cleared of all charges. Democrat -Liberal leader Adriean Videanu accused Ponta of being the "moral culprit" in Panait's death, also accusing him of blackmailing Panait, which eventually lead to his suicide.”
The accusations from Wikipedia are many, but I have reproduced only the criminal part, in which I see again the death of my brother and the attack against me.    I AM ASKING THE ROMANIAN POLICE WHAT DID IT DO, FOR MORE THAN ONE YEAR, FOR THE DISCOVERY OF CRIMINALS WHO COMMITTED THE HOLD-UP AGAINST MY BROTHER AND TO BRING THEM IN FRONT OF JUSTICE? WHAT ABOUT THE PRESS ? WHAT ABOUT THE CIVIL SOCIETY? REASONS FOR WHICH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND OF THE UNITES STATES MUST BE REQUESTED. IF THE POLICE ACCOMPLISHED ITS DUTY IN THE CASE OF MY BROTHER, TANASESCU MIRCEA, THE PROSECUTOR PANAIT WOULD HAVE LIVED EVEN TODAY.    Waiting an official answer, thank you for your attention.
  GHEORGHE TANASESCU / AUGUST 02, 2014.

Bookmark and Share
Tipareste acest articol
O noua aparitie editoriala - Elena Chirita
STEFAN CUCU - „EMBLEMATIC FILOLOG CLASIC ROMÂN DE AZI”
Coperta Carte - Elena Chirita
Elena Chirita - Cum vorbim in public
Madalina Corina Diaconu
Madalina Corina Diaconu
Lazar Ladariu –„Secunda de pamânt”
HOLOCAUST. Destine la rascruce
Elena Chirita - POLITICA SI DIPLOMATIE - interviuri
Mariana Cristescu - Trandafirii desertului
Pentru Credinta, Neam si Tara de Lazar Ladariu si Mariana Cristescu
Locations of visitors to this page